Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn hong kong cinema. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn hong kong cinema. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Ba, 14 tháng 4, 2015

I CAN'T SEE ME LOVING NOBODY BUT YOU

A review requested by Bryan C, with thanks for contributing to the Second Quinquennial Antagony & Ecstasy ACS Fundraiser.

If there's one big, unanswerable complaint to be made against Wong Kar-wai's 1997 romantic tragedy Happy Together, it's that three years later, Wong made In the Mood for Love, and in the process made the earlier film feel like a bit of a test run. That's a manifestly unfair standard to hold against anything; In the Mood for Love isn't merely the best film of the director's career, it's one of the very best romantic dramas in all of cinema, and you can't start using absolute perfection as the gatekeeper to what movies you deem acceptable or not. It's just that even by the standards of Wong's deliberately redundant career, full of movies that feel like they're in conversation with each other, Happy Together has a lot of overlap with the latter movie. But it also got there first, and deserves tribute for its primacy, above and beyond the simple fact that everything Happy Together does, it does superlatively well.

Structured more as a series of impressionistic memories than a narrative, Happy Together is, generally speaking, about a relationship that's not working and the enormously "big" attempt the participants make to keep things together, more out of habit and a belief in romanticism than anything that could possibly be defended as good sense. We mostly get the story from Lai Yiu-fai (Tony Leung Chiu-wai), recalling how he and his boyfriend Ho Po-wing (Leslie Cheung) threw caution to the winds and skipped out on Hong Kong to visit Argentina with nothing more than hope and a desire to see the Iguazu Falls, which they know only from a tacky little animated lamp. Very nearly the first thing they do upon arriving is to break up, at which point the film flings itself into severe, high-contrast black and white, and for some time thereafter, the penniless exes cross paths, reunite, and relive the same pattern of manipulation, strangled intimacy, emotional abuse, break-up, and then regret for having broken up. At a certain point, Lai finally makes an honest accounting of himself and his needs, and decides to return to Asia, at last snapping the cycle, to both men's private sorrow.

In other words, not much "happens" in Happy Together, but it not-happens in the most delectable way. Wong's filmography leaves him more open that almost any other great contemporary filmmaker to charges that he favors style over substance, but nothing else in his career, not even In the Mood for Love itself, so clearly depicts how his movies use style as a means of charting his character's emotions. And not just in the incredibly obvious ways, like how the film uses black and white cinematography to mark out the characters' first break-up, jumping back into color when they're back together, but also for a few insert shots of objects and moments that represent a sort of idealised romantic potential for them in their loneliness. That's fine and clever, if a bit blunt. Far subtler is its range of colors when it's actually in color, as Wong and his indispensable cinematographer Christopher Doyle (for proof, look what happened in both men's careers after they dispensed with each other) click from the sallow yellows of urban night into a much harsher, metallic array of muted colors, and then into a softer, more saturated palette, a series of shifts that don't map onto the narrative in any clear one-to-one fashion, but still describe a fluctuation of emotions that may represent what the characters feel in the moment but surely represent what they feel about it later on, when they're in our position of revisiting a story that's all taking place in the past tense.

What makes Happy Together truly great, though, isn't even its visual panache, which it after all largely inherits from Wong and Doyle's earlier work (where, in faith, it is perhaps better - ask me whether this film or 1994's Chungking Express is the more compellingly shot, and I'll eventually, if reluctantly, side with the earlier film), but in its powerful formlessness, its most distinctive legacy for In the Mood for Love, and the one that matters most, above things like a lingering sense of moody romance and the way that the latter film revises the southernmost lighthouse in South America into ruined wall in Angkor Wat. The most distinctive thing about both films, within Wong's career and generally, is their almost dreamlike texture, and that emerged fully formed and virtually perfect in Happy Together, a movie veritably constructed from ellipses and implications. When the director and editors William Chang and Wong Ming Lam suddenly throw in an unexpected insert shot or two, when the action stutters into a random piece of slow-motion, when scenes glide together along the spine of the voice-over narration despite the images not linking up in any normal way, we're seeing a film work towards building its characters' psychologies into its structure, not by depicting what they think and feel in terms of story and performance. Indeed, it takes two absolute powerhouse performances by Leung and Chung to sketch out who Yiu-fai and Po-wing are beyond the most superficial elements of "the one is kind of mean and likes sex, the other is moody and insular". And they are both magnificent - Leung's work in Wong's films represents the strongest collection of performances in Hong Kong cinema that I've yet encountered, and this is probably the best of it all - playing the characters with more depth than the series of essentialised poses that the script requires them to be, without bringing so much realism to bear that it threatens the dreamlike structure of the whole movie.

Still, what is best and most moving about Happy Together is not the way it works as a pair of character sketches about two particular people, but the way it reduces two particular people into states of being and feeling. It's all tremendously abstract and conceptual, but to a certain degree, that's the way the characters exist in the world anyway; the film's repeated invocation of Iguazu Falls makes it very clear that it exists as the ultimate expression of non-specific exoticised, hopeful romanticism for them (when it finally appears, Wong and Doyle let the water drench the lens and distort the picture into a literally impressionistic collection of colors and amorphous lines, and in so doing permit it to remain romantic), while the presentation of Argentina as a cacophony of unfamiliar spaces and noisy Spanish strips it of the concrete physicality that lends weight and gravity to the similarly fluid Chunking Express or Days of Being Wild. It is, ultimately, a film about two lovers invested in the textures and feeling of love, instead of the specific realities of it, and it indulges them by transferring their impressions into its own form. That is what leads them repeatedly and inexorably to tragedy, but it's also what makes the film an outstanding artistic triumph.

Thứ Bảy, 11 tháng 4, 2015

YUNNAN MOUNTAIN HIGH

A review requested by Shoumik H, with thanks for contributing to the Second Quinquennial Antagony & Ecstasy ACS Fundraiser.

Johnnie To is a name that you might know, and you definitely should. He is nothing less than the finest director of action movies and crime thrillers in Hong Kong since that country's action cinema wave golden age started to run out in the early 1990s. Which means, sadly, that he hasn't had the international exposure of a John Woo, for example, though that's the company that he deserves to be named in.

But even a genius cannot live on genre alone, and so it was that some half a decade after his major international breakthrough with 2004's Breaking News and 2005's Election, To took his first break from thrillers in a long time, to make a pair of romances, of all things. 2011's politically invested romcom Don't Go Breaking My Heart was co-directed with Wai Ka-Fai (as was its 2014 sequel), but 2012's Romancing in Thin Air was all To (Wai, however, co-wrote the screenplay, along with Jevons Au Man-Kit and Yau Nan-Hoi, reuniting three-quarters of the team that scripted Don't Go Breaking My Heart). So if you happened to wonder what it would look like if an action film expert decided to take a crack at a melodramatic love story on the '50s model - and the more I linger on that formulation, the more I genuinely can't imagine why somebody wouldn't be interested in knowing what that looks like - there's not really a better vehicle out there to scratch that particular itch.

The caveat being that Romancing in Thin Air doesn't actually do much to nod its head towards its director's more visible career. It is a fully committed romantic drama, nothing ironic or genre-mashing about it. And this is absolutely for the good. It's a better-directed film than Don't Go Breaking My Heart, drawing on more of To's established gifts as a filmmaker but always in service to its needs as a melodrama, and while the earlier film ends up being a stand-out romantic comedy mostly because it doesn't take much effort to achieve that in the 21st Cenury, Romancing in Thin Air is a stand-out romance because it's impressively made and sensitively acted. And it has a perfectly suitable screenplay, which is neither a very enthusiastic compliment nor a complaint, exactly.

It's your basic "two lost souls thrown together" deal, opening with Michael Lau (Louis Koo), beloved film superstar and heartthrob proposing to his girlfriend and co-star (Gao Yuanyuan) on the very stage of the Hong Kong Film Awards, where he has just won Best Actor. A whirlwind montage quickly drags us through time and space - I am not slighting the film, I hope, if I suggest that the elliptical, vague editing and pacing here, blithely commenting on temporality and the devouring nature of celebrity news, is my favorite bit of filmmaking in the whole feature - to their wedding, which finds them interrupted at the last second by her old lover (Wang Baoqiang), who reminds her of their promise years ago to always love each other. More elliptical editing throws Michael into a drunken stupor and thence into a truck, where he accidentally heads from Hong Kong all the way to Yunnan province in mainland China, in the fancifully named county-city of Shangri-La. He comes to - barely - at the Deep Woods Hotel, 3800 meters up the mountains, where he's nursed to health by the hotel's owner, Sau (Sammi Cheng), and taught to breath the rarefied air at that high altitude. She's a relatively new transplant herself, having only come to that area seven years prior; Michael ends up learning the full story one night in bar of how she fell in love a shy fellow named Tian (Li Guangjie), who went missing in the forest and has been lost ever since.

The film's original title - I'm an idiot American and don't know if it's in Mandarin or Cantonese, the two languages spoken in the film - translates as High Altitude Romance II, in full defiance of the fact that there is no High Altitude Romance I. And once we've noted that fact, some splendid possibilities start to unlock themselves. We're basically watching a film that's a sequel to itself, though even what that means is a bit difficult to pin down. It could be that the story of Sau coming to the Deep Woods Hotel, finding love, and thus shape and meaning in her wandering life - which we see in detail, taking up a large percentage of the film's 111 minute running time - is High Altitude Romance, and Michael's step through the same process is High Altitude Romance II. It's at least as possible that the film we're watching for about three-quarters of the total is High Altitude Romance, and the sudden, new thing that the film turns into in its last act is High Altitude Romance II; the one where the characters reclaim the reality they would prefer to be true by harnessing the power of cinema itself to rewrite history (the film's final shot, and the meaning it imparts, is also the final shot & meaning of a different film that exists within the movie, and which the characters watch knowing it to be a movie). Both of which are much more interesting possibilities than the watery play on "vanishing in thin air" that the film has to live with in English.

But my point, anyway: the film is about history repeating itself with variations, about lovers finding solace in one another, though not in exactly the ways that genre demands or that the plot sets you up to expect: it's far more nuanced than "broken people meet on a mountain, fall in love", right down to its beautifully unfilled ending. It is, sure, primarily about the way that falling in love makes people feel a certain stability that allows them to go out and fix the rest of the things going wrong in their lives, and Koo and Cheng - especially Cheng, a pop star ending a four-year movie drought with this role - do exemplary work in sketching out the state of people who are quite happy to feel the warm and fuzzy feelings they've got going on, but too aware of what awful things can come of it to let themselves go all the way. To's direction grounds all of this in fully blocked-out, concrete spaces, turning the melodrama into a lived reality, anchoring the somewhat silly supporting characters in a way that makes them feel like personality types and not character models. For something so full of frosty snowbound cinematography - and set, for chrissake, in Shangri-La - Romancing in Thin Air has an awful lot of physical weight.

The one big flaw with it, and unfortunately it's not a little thing, is that to facilitate the development of all these themes, the screenwriters really have to start piling on the contrivances and just-so plot developments in the second half. Basically, the moment that the extended flashback telling Sau's history wraps up, the film plunges headlong into a series of spectacular coincidences and only borderline-plausible character behaviors. This is redeemed somewhat by the way the final 20 minutes shape it and do something complex with it, but the shift from a delicate place-study centered around people who need to get away from life to nurse themselves back the mental health into a romantic thriller about lost celebrities and other shocking discoveries is one that To can't quite handle, and the actors don't even bother trying to rationalise. There's a lot of loveliness and sweet human drama in it, and it's particularly thoughtful about what romantic movies do for us as viewers and why that's both good and bad. Let us not diminish any of that. But let us also acknowledge that the film has lumps and rough patches the like of which no sweetly humane melodrama should need to cope with.

Thứ Sáu, 6 tháng 9, 2013

YOUR KUNG FU IS WEAK

To begin with, there's no getting around it: The Grandmaster was massively fucked with on its way to U.S. theaters. Is it clearly the case that the changes that director Wong Kar-wai executed under the watchful eye of chop-happy impresario Harvey Weinstein make the film worse? Search me. But it's just not possible to watch the film as it exists in North America at this time, and wonder: are those erratic, jarring cuts (of which there are a noticeable number) part of the compromised version we're getting here, or was that what Wong had it mind all along? Are the strange narrative elisions there on purpose, and the title cards are there solely to connect the dots for Westerners? Or are those cards summarising scenes that stayed behind in China? Is Zhang Ziyi's character supposed to wander in and out of the plot so randomly, or does she have more to do in the fuller version (this, at least, I can answer: yes, she does a lot more, and that knowledge alone is enough to piss me off; what little bit of Zhang we get in the American cut is enough to mark her out as the best actor in the whole cast).

But let me be fair and review the movie I saw, and leave reviewing the movie I didn't see for what I hope will be an awesome Blu-Ray set containing all three cuts of the film released across the world.* Viewed in that light, The Grandmaster U.S. is hardly a disappointment, though a lot of it feels like the Romantic stylist in the director's chair is on autopilot for large swaths of the film, and while Philippe Le Sourd's cinematography certainly showcases one utterly gorgeous chiaroscuro tableau after another, I pang for the loss of Wong's longtime collaborator Christopher Doyle, who could do utterly gorgeous tableaux like nobody's business, and also make them feel "meatier", like the beauty serves any kind of purpose besides just being nice to look at. No sane person with eyes could deny that The Grandmaster is eye candy of the first order, but there's nothing really about this story, set in this period, that requires this visual style. It is, in effect, a Wong Kar-wai film noir, and though writing it like that gets me all kinds of hot and bothered, there are plenty of films in his career where that construction would have made a hell of a lot more sense than it does here.

The film is - in its Weinstein-backed incarnation, anyway - a biopic of Ip Man (Tony Leung Chiu Wai - of the the two Tony Leungs, the one who's done more films with Wong), the man chiefly responsible for spreading the wing chun style of martial arts through China and then the world. "And he taught Bruce Lee!" pipes up the marketing campaign. Yes, he did, but The Grandmaster isn't founded on that fact and doesn't really give a shit about it, except in title cards that are known to be an addition for the distributor's idealised Stupid As Fuck Americans.

In the decade that it took Wong to bring this story to fruition, Ip Man's life has been the subject of a handful of other biopics, but The Grandmaster isn't looking to tell a clear-cut "this is what happened" kind of tale, and thus doesn't feel redundant. It take the matter of Ip Man's life as a means for exploring emotional states (the director's specialty, overall), not for tracking the spread of wing chun, nor of clearly depicting the movements in Ip's life, which is all wobbly-paced in this telling, anyway. The opening act consists of the time that Ip was present at the visit of Gong Yutian (Wang Qingxiang), the greatest grandmaster of northern kung fu, to the leaders of southern fighting styles; the southerners all decided that Ip should be their chosen fighter in combat with Gong, to prove the worthiness of their philosophies and abilities. At this time, Ip also meets the grandmaster's haughty daughter Gong Er (Zhang Ziyi), and they have a spirited fight with one another that ends in victory for her, and a promise from him that they will have a rematch someday.

This does not happen: instead, Japan invades China and Ip's life goes to hell. Divided from his family, obliged to eke out a living teaching wing chun in Hong Kong during and after World War II, he can rely only on his well-honed philosophies to keep him content and alive. Gong Er loses, arguably, even more: her very sense of self is damaged in the war as her father's chosen successor Ma San (Zhang Jin) becomes a collaborator with the Japanese, leading her on a lifelong quest for revenge.

In this iteration, The Grandmaster has been streamlined and filled with exposition to make it as clear as possible what's going on, and this has the profoundest negative effect I can imagine: it is a film which lifelessly synopsises everything in momentum-crushing asides that leave the connections between moments we actually see pointlessly vague, and while very nearly every individual scene in the movie works on its own merits, the whole film is a disjointed, meandering mess, following multiple plot threads without elegance or clarity. And perhaps I am just a stupid American who doesn't know remotely enough about the 20th Century history of kung fu to follow the rhythm of this film, but since that's precisely the issue that this cut of The Grandmaster was meant to address, I think it's fair to say that it failed.

Still, the minute-to-minute experience of watching the film is always engaging and sometimes quite rewarding, particularly since Ip Man and Gong Er are two such complex and interesting people, though as Gong has the more tragic arc, it's hardly surprising that she ends up making more of an impression, and the fact that the material plays very much as "greatest hits" material for the character means that Zhang has a lot more dramatic beats per minute than Leung does, whose performance ends up receding just a bit as a result.

Wong being not much of an action director but very much a director of character drama, the martial arts sequences end up playing like the songs in a musical or the duets in a ballet: they are the stand in for psychological development, and they do this quite well (the first action scene, maybe less so: though the slow-motion-in-the-rain concept behind it is so perfectly, quintessentially Wong Kar-wai pictorialism that I will forgive all lapses). Legendary fight choreographer Yuen Woo-ping doesn't reach the heights of invention and intensity of his best stuff, of course - Leung studied martial arts diligently to take the role, but not for the lifetime it would require to become an actual grandmaster - but allowing that the fighting is required to operate in a much cooler register than "real" martial arts action films permit (for this is no action film at all), it's cunningly reduced to focus, not on the pyrotechnic fighting that we're missing, but on the narrative quality of what we're given.

I find myself torn: this is beautiful, poetic, elegiac filmmaking, and its depiction of time passing and things being loss is mournful without being obnoxiously sad, just sort of melancholy and nostalgic. But it's a strange movie, that builds this way and then peters out, introduces subplots randomly, forgets about characters even in the act of introducing them, and there's absolutely no flow between scenes, just a hectic attempt at back-and-forth structure that doesn't pay off the way I think it's supposed to (ideally, this seems like it ought to be about the way that the present tense and memory interact; it only very rarely achieves that). I can't imagine that the Chinese cut isn't superior, but I'm not discussing the Chinese cut. The American version is beautiful and moody, and it is muddy in expression, but probably worth seeing anyway. Still, this film, in this cut, is the least coherent and engaging film that Wong has made in his home country, and as likable as it is, it's definitely not worth the many years it took to complete it.

6/10